Random fishing expeditions for vendors of PBX platforms, which are
going to be on private networks, is inefficient to the point of zero
returns. There are so many other layers of security that have to be
penetrated before the concept of "Asterisk" is a security element that
is even considered... If you've seen embassy telecommunications
systems in any security-minded nation, you'd understand that vendor
identity for primary platform isn't a serious consideration.
JT
On Sep 1, 2009, at 2:43 AM, C. Savinovich wrote:
> I would be so paranoid... what if they want that information to see
> what
> embassies can be hacked?
>
> CS
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com
> [mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of John Todd
> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 6:53 PM
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> Subject: [asterisk-biz] Any installations in European Consulates or
> Embassies?
>
>
> I've got a rather unusual request to discover if any European
> Consulates are
> running Asterisk as their PBX platform. For that matter, are there
> any
> embassies that could step forward? This is for a private query (by
> another
> consulate) and replies may be privately held if requested, other than
> informing the end user. Or they may be public, which would be
> preferred so
> we can get various government agencies on the list of reference-able
> sites.
>
> JT
>
---
John Todd email:jtodd@digium.com
Digium, Inc. | Asterisk Open Source Community Director
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville AL 35806 - USA
direct: +1-256-428-6083 http://www.digium.com/
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment