Its not a problem, I just thought I wasn't clear in the way I had
explained it previously. I have no idea what 34 is supposed to be, I
don't believe its defined anywhere.
Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 15:01 -0500, Igor Hernandez wrote:
>> Hey Bret,
>>
>> Thanks for the response. What we actually need is nothing as complicated
>> as that. For whatever reason the client needs to see code 34 regardless
>> of the cause of call failure. So basically if the call doesn't connect
>> I'm supposed to send back code 34.
>>
>> Does that make sense?
>>
>
> Yes, and based on what was originally said the hangup(34) should work
> (is 34 even defined by anything or is that just some arbitrary number
> they picked?) I was curious if there was ability to do more than
> busy/noanswer detection and thought it might apply to your situation,
> certainly it will to some. Personally I dont care much either way, its
> just that I discovered some unanswered questions in the thread and felt
> like getting em answered and used you as an excuse :P
>
> Its a personal quirk, if I know part of something and know that there is
> more I want to know that little bit more even if I have no plans of ever
> using it.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment