1) Billing problems every single bill
2) Only supported inband DTMF (may now support rfc2833)
The quality was decent as they were ulaw when I used them. However they can't seem to deliver CNAM from everywhere on their origination product which is odd. Random DIDs would include CNAM and others would not.
Granted things might have changed as they are moving to new Sonus gateways.
Bottom line, decent quality voice if you don't need all the extra bells and whistles and can tolerate tons of billing mistakes.
On Feb 7, 2008 9:00 PM, <jcapp@anteil.com> wrote:
We used XO SIP with * for just short of a year. It worked well and was
very reliable. Contact me off list if you'd like more details.
Jim> _______________________________________________
> Dear List:
>
> Can anyone vouch for the interoperability of XO's SIP service and * ?
>
> E.g., how long have you been using it, voice quality, price
> competitiveness, shortcomings, Asterisk configuration?
>
> Thanks a bunch!
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-biz mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment