I find the semantic distinction uninteresting.Kevin P. Fleming wrote:Bill Michaelson wrote:ztd-ethmf.cAs I said, that driver has been part of Zaptel, so could not have been removed.Correction: it was in Zaptel SVN for a very short time, it had been committed without proper code review. It was removed quickly thereafter, and was never part of an Zaptel release.
The bottom line for me is that it was required to make a competitor's product work. And it did, once I obtained it.
Conclusions may be drawn from that according to the preference of readers.
No comments:
Post a Comment