> On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 19:13 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
> > So to sum up Alex's very long winded explanation. It is the "status
> > quo" that Jay called BS. I guess some people are not ready for the
> > paradigm shift or they were and now want to shift if back.
>
> I concur that it is the status quo, at least for the most part. Gregory
> appears to also with his comment elsewhere about how its because people
> will pay it. This largely makes me curious as to what Jay's answer is.
Jay's answer, which he thought he was quite clear about in the first
place, is that the service and reliability expectations placed upon
business telephony equipment are at least an order of magnitude higher,
if not two, than those of PCs.
Supporting this is not cheap.
Someone has to pay for it.
When was the last time you had to tell the president of the company
"Oh, sorry, your conference call is going to have to wait; we're
rebooting the phone system"?
Or, to put this another way, what do you think the food cost of that
$.99 sweet iced tea you bought at McDonalds this morning actually was?
(Hint: about 9 cents.)
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates
'87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA
+1 727 647 1274
Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
Those who count the vote decide everything.
-- (Joseph Stalin)
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment